By Ken Reed
College football’s Bowl Championship Series (BCS) is dead. That’s a good thing. The cartel system never crowned a true national champion and was unpopular with players and fans.
Unfortunately, in its place we now have an ill-conceived four-team playoff scheme that will provide an expected $500 million windfall for college football’s power brokers, but won’t address any of the key issues in the game.
The move away from the BCS to the four-team playoff was done for two reasons: 1) to avoid the inevitable anti-trust legal challenges to the cartel-like BCS model, while continuing to limit access and revenue distribution to smaller conferences; and 2) to make more money – with none targeted for the athletes that actually produce it.
The fact is, a commercial sports entertainment enterprise like big-time college football is incompatible with the educational mission of our universities. The ultimate solution is for our colleges and universities to get out of the sports entertainment business. It’s been done before. The University of Chicago once dropped its Big Ten football program to focus on its educational mission.
In their proper perspective, athletics can be compatible with the mission of a college or university. But it needs to be at the Division III level, where there are no athletic scholarships; where the athletes are students first, and the schools aren’t seeking profits at all costs from their sports programs.
Granted, that’s not going to happen on a large scale anytime soon. So, we need to make the best of the current situation.
The new mini-playoff system isn’t intended to address any of the multitude of problems in college athletics in general, or college football in particular. Let’s take a quick look at a few key issues.
According to a joint study by Drexel University and the National College Players Association, college football and basketball players on “full” scholarship in the NCAA’s top division are required to annually come up with an average of $3,222 out of their own pockets to cover the expenses of college attendance. That’s unconscionable given that both sports bring in millions in revenue.
Second, students are increasingly being asked to help foot the bill for big-time college athletics through student fees. Rutgers’ students set the pace during the 2010-11 fiscal year, coughing up nearly $1,000 each to fund sports while academic budgets were being slashed.
Third, despite the recent widespread celebration of the 40th anniversary of Title IX, one of our country’s great civil rights laws, the gender gap in opportunities between male and female athletes has actually expanded in recent years, due primarily to the escalating arms race in football and men’s basketball.
Fourth, even with a growing mound of research pointing to the likelihood that football players risk long-term brain damage due to concussions and sub-concussive brain trauma, the NCAA and college athletic departments continue to do very little to educate football players about safety issues surrounding head trauma.
The lords of college athletics — college athletic directors, conference commissioners, and university presidents – spent this past spring — and a chunk of summer – greedily talking about ways they could protect their cartel while enhancing revenues. If they were ethical educators and administrators, focused on doing what’s best for the athletes and the sport, they would’ve come out of the meetings with action steps like these:
- Scrap the four-team playoff idea in favor of a 16-team playoff (the 11 FBS conference champions, and five at-large teams). This model provides the fairest and most exciting way to determine a national champion. It is also the preference of a large majority of fans and players – two key stakeholder groups whose voices have been ignored by decision-makers. Analysts believe revenue from a 16-team playoff could be $1 billion plus, which would go a long ways toward funding the following programs.
- Establish a funding mechanism to benefit the players that produce the revenue. First, multi-year scholarships (four years, or five if the school decides to redshirt the player) are brought back to replace the current one-year renewable scholarships, which are based solely on athletic performance and have nothing to do with education. Second, the existing out-of-pocket shortfall that Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) players currently face is covered out of playoff proceeds. Finally, a large portion of the college football playoff revenue is set aside to establish trust funds for players who complete their college degrees. This incentivizes athletes to graduate and allows universities to symbolically communicate that they value their athletes’ education.
- Halt the practice of using student fees (along with university academic budgets) to help fund athletic departments. Students shouldn’t be required to support big-time college athletics.
- Use a significant portion of the playoff monies to move FBS universities toward Title IX compliance by rectifying the gender inequities in college sports, most notably in the areas of participation opportunities, scholarship dollars, and operating budgets for female athletes.
- Start a campaign to educate NCAA athletes about the risks associated with head trauma. It’s safe to say the vast majority of today’s college football players don’t know anything about chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), or any other long-term neurological conditions related to brain trauma. It’s the responsibility of athletic departments to change that.
If our universities don’t begin to take actions like these on their own, it will be time to force them to do so. Teddy Roosevelt once demanded major changes to the game of football in order for it to remain on our college campuses. A similar step might soon be needed.
– Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director, League of FansPrint
Q’s & A’s with Leading Sports Reformers: Joseph Siprut
11 Apr 2013
Q’s & A’s with Leading Sports Reformers: Fred Bowen
20 Feb 2013
Q & A with Legendary Sportswriter Frank Deford
27 Jan 2013
Q’s & A’s with Leading Sports Reformers: Brenda VanLengen
28 Dec 2012
Q’s & A’s with Leading Sports Reformers: Diana Cutaia
1 Nov 2012
Q’s & A’s with Leading Sports Reformers: Patrick Hruby
28 Sep 2012
Q’s & A’s with Leading Sports Reformers: Allen Sack
8 Aug 2012
Q’s & A’s with Leading Sports Reformers: Donna Lopiano
5 Jun 2012
Q’s & A’s with Jim Thompson
14 May 2012
Q’s & A’s with Leading Sports Activists: Dave Zirin
18 Apr 2012
Q’s & A’s with Leading Sports Activists: William Dowling
27 Mar 2012
Q’s & A’s with Notable Sports Figures: Taylor Branch
9 Mar 2012
Q’s & A’s with Notable Sports Figures – Joe Nocera
27 Feb 2012
Q’s & A’s with Notable Sports Figures – Chris Nowinski
13 Feb 2012
Q’s & A’s with Notable Sports Figures: Joe Ehrmann
3 Feb 2012
Q & A With John Gagliardi
24 Jan 2012
Q & A With Robert Lipsyte
10 Jan 2012
Q & A With Jay Coakley
27 Dec 2011
Q & A With John Gerdy
9 Dec 2011
- Q’s & A’s with Leading Sports Reformers: Joseph Siprut
Special FeaturesFrom League of Fans
League of Fans is a sports reform project founded by Ralph Nader to encourage social & civic responsibility in sports industry & culture. See League of Fans Core Principles
April 6, 2013League of Fans Calls for More Humanistic Coaching Programs. Click here to see the release.
League of Fans Announces 2012 “Sport At Its Best” Awards
December 20, 2011 Click here to read the news release and report on Ralph Nader's Call for Budding Sports Reformers
December 7, 2011 Click here to read the news release and report on Ralph Nader's Claim that Sports Media Are Dropping the Ball on Social, Cultural, and Economic Issues in Sports
November 22, 2011 Click here to read the news release and report on the campaign to Make the NCAA Live Up to Its Stated Purpose
October 26, 2011 Click here to read the news release and report on the campaign to create a National Sports Commission
October 11, 2011 Click here to read the news release and report on the campaign to Ensure Equal Opportunity in Sports for all Americans
September 21, 2011 Click here to read the news release and report on putting the "Youth" back into "Youth Sports"
September 8, 2011 Click here to read the news release and report on the campaign to abolish the BCS and Establish a College Football Playoff
August 25, 2011
Read the news release and report on Mandatory Implementation of King-Devick Concussion Test in High School and Youth Sports
August 11, 2011
Click here to read the report and news release and about the campaign to promote sports and physical education for all students
Read the news release and report on Campaign to Promote Humanistic Coaching Education Programs
July 13, 2011
Read the news release and report on the Push For Community Ownership in Professional Sports
June 24, 2011
Read the news release and report and Sports Manifesto on Re-Launch of League of Fans
March 24, 2011
NCAA's Reaction to League of Fans' Proposal
March 29, 2011
League of Fans' Response to NCAA
March 25, 2011
League of Fans Proposes Eliminating Athletic Scholarships to Help Restore Integrity on College Campuses
League of Fans is a project of the Center for Study of Responsive Law.